US®
-VJ1 * o.iounn*.. [DOT] „nOOintlV,
upoji aP* JU''
1. Have the following persons *>
gil>ceh.c° ' lo positions, at the salaries name ^ so® ^e, 1896, as follows :-Francis G. \"vergne'ngvli?: lector of customs, $120 ; Joseph L g V Superior Court, Quebec, $5'?00,'9 nn0 ;
Langelier, judge, Superior Court.
M. C. Cameron, lieutenant S°Av®'eals, °%drt' F. Lister, judge, Court of APSpperi°r S5.000 ; P. A. Choquette, judge,
of inland4'000 ' C' 1' Rinfret>
district inspector s°leil n„Jevenue>
Quebec, $2,500 ; C. A. Beau-bier, 'mV^Lraaster>
Montreal, $4,000 ; M. E. Ber-?ioners sanLof the board of railway -commis-b°arcj 7, .,9 [DOT] A. G. Blair, chairman of the "titton n allway commissioners, $10,000 ; B. M. ontario' «f!Lof the High Court of Judicature, Superior 7,'000 ; H- G- Carroll, judge of the eav'es rt' Quebec, $3,500 ; Sir Louis
Qesmol. * ' Supreme Court, Canada, $7,000 ; "[DOT]000 * Ip 'c [DOT]iu<ise' Superior Court, Quebec,
Coi
Per;
Simons'" «?-„„Flint- Clerk of the House of . rior A ' ?3>4°0 ; T.
Judge i,urt' Quebec
T. Fortin, judge of the Su-*ymge of7n" Y Quebec, $4,000 ; D. C. Fraser, o A. C Sr® PuPreme Court, Nova Scotia, $4,000; iPcbec (/!, [DOT] judge of the Superior Court,
tis6t Sol * E- C. King, Senate ; B. R. ?*%e c nate i John Yeo, Senate ; A. M. DeGodat the time they the House of Comi 'cue i go, senate , ivi
b°Ut, Soul46 ; W- c- Edwards. Senate ; J.
Wr.rfaf? * J- H. Legris, Senate ?
, re an,„- e said persons lll0ns of^p^hted, members of 3. it t,Canada ?
Panicular fforeS?ing list is not correct, in what Rt i ls 14 ineorrect ?
^ihister^ Sh' WILFEID LAURIER (Prime l11 this ,':n 4." the information sought for *J|Hili(, ^hegtioi^ is already to be found in
**88 To ,T tS'
u McCarthy, osler, hoskin and j. harcourt.
* asked :
a*!aiisarg ?*F' Qsier referred to on page 679, ,Jee 0f *' by the premier, as having received tn® ®rm of a trom the Dominion, a member of Urt, bar,) McCarthy, Osier, Hoskin and Har-lj0n risters, of Toronto ?
hr °t .WARLES FITZPATRICK (Minis: Yes tlce^ The answer to this question
jIr AY harbour branch railway.
1. W^RGEY asked :
LhfiI'aJ' Harho11® total cost °f the Belfast and Hat' trom <vU.L Hallway, Prince Edward Is^
«at
of
2 thf°UtJ1.p°rt to Murray river ; and
at p,esti®ated cost
* ««u iq ""^u uuat of same ?
So,,?6 first e t°tal cost, and cost per mile, 3 2!P°n, eoj®Veu m'l®s of said railway from
ere 5°.ng 6ast 7
1bile!1's °f the ™aJes made by competent en-4. aUd what * °£ cuusttuction of said eleven We't*>
m 1 was the amount estimated ? bo;6'1 and tak mUes 0£ this railway are com, 5- m,any tn i 1 6n over by the department ; and Jhig jhat kj, ,s Remain to be completed ?
*he '°aa, anU o£ ballast was to be used on
*. Harsk Cl Under whose supervision was ^hiheT? °f the ballasting
or gravelling been
IthnfQgatn c intention of the government to
[DOT] ."tin™ Le cVi,.. - ul L1,K government; to frwf' Sates „„.fes made, that ballasting, to**' Wi)11 7 * ® culverts are of inferior con-
0£ satnre Ught 'I'p amount paid in lawyer's fees m51. If. anti the Way 7 wbat were the names the Lk® sVms bald each ?
-os btiieg Lof construction for the first lai*f)',Hy Were ?ee<Ie<i the government esti-of tenders not Invited for the re-
3o
the
work T
