George Perry Graham (Minister of Railways and Canals)
Liberal
Mr. GRAHAM.
I will give the exact figures to-morrow. I do not like to give them from memory.
Subtopic: EDITION
Mr. GRAHAM.
I will give the exact figures to-morrow. I do not like to give them from memory.
Mr. REID.
I see in the Auditor General's Report at page W-83 a payment of $7,032.31 for staff last year.
Mr. GRAHAM.
That was before the lease was executed. We do not pay anything now.
Mr. J. D. REID.
Will the minister tell me whether all of the lockmasters have been dismissed?
Mr. GRAHAM.
The lessee has taken them all over; we do not pay for them.
Mr. PAPINEAU.
Since the canal was leased the lessees are paying all of the men except the overseer. This dyke which is at the head of the Beauharnois canal was built in 1852. After the canal was completed the engineers discovered that they had made a mistake in calculating the level and that instead of getting 9 feet of water they had only five or six feet. They proposed the construction of the dyke between Grand Island and the shore of the St. Lawrence at the entrance to the Beauharnois canal. This is the dyke that the minister is now asking authority to repair in order to keep the water at its proper level.
Mr. J. D. REID.
Then this dyke is being built for the benefit of those who have leased the canal?
Mr. PAPINEAU.
It was bought in 1852, and it has been repaired ever since to keep the water at the proper level.
Mr. J. D. REID.
Exactly, but the canal was leased in the condition it was at that time. The government leased it to a company to be used for water-power only. Now they find that they have only five or six feet of water and they want to have this dyke repaired. They ask you to spend this money in order that you may give them nine or ten feet of water.
Mr. GRAHAM.
This has nothing more to do with lessees of the Beauharnois canal than it has to do with Timbuctoo. The same lake supplies our Soulanges canal and we must have the same level of water for it. This matter was threshed out in the House last year. There were a great many petitions received asking that the property of private individuals should be protected. If we do not repair this dyke we may spend twice as much to compensate people for land which may be drowned or flooded.
Mr. GRAHAM.
Mr. LANCASTER.
Why do not the lessees do that?
Mr. GRAHAM.
This was built fifty years ago.
Mr. LANCASTER.
They have leased the property and why should they not keep it in repair? It is they who get the benefit.
Mr. GRAHAM.
This dyke was built under a judgment of the court. We examined this question very closely an'd there is no question about the necessity of the work unless we are prepared to accept the responsibility for drowning out very many acres of land.
Mr. LANCASTER.
It is right that some one should repair it, but why should the government lease this property to a lessee and then repair it at its own expense? Why should not the lessee keep it in order?
Mr. GRAHAM.
This has nothing to do with the Beauharnois canal lease at all.
Mr. J. D. REID.
The hon. gentleman that sits behind the Minister of Justice said that it was to increase the level.
Mr. PAPINEAU.
Mr. J. D. REID.
Is it part of the Beauharnois canal system?