May 18, 1923

JAPANESE IMMIGRATION

PETITION NOT IN REGULAR FORM-MOTION FOR ITS RETURN

LIB

Hewitt Bostock (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

I have the honour to

inform the House that the Clerk of Petitions reports that he has examined the petition of W. J. Bartlett and others, of Vancouver and other places in British Columbia. The attention of the House is directed to the fact that the said petition is irregular in that it is addressed to the Right Honourable William Lyon Mackenzie King and the members of the government of Canada, and not to the House of Commons in Parliament assembled, and as it does not contain three signatures on the sheet containing the prayer of the petition, as required by rule 75, it should not be received.

Topic:   JAPANESE IMMIGRATION
Subtopic:   PETITION NOT IN REGULAR FORM-MOTION FOR ITS RETURN
Permalink
CON

William Garland McQuarrie

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. McQUARRIE:

May I ask that the

petition be returned to me so that I can send it to the petitioners?

Topic:   JAPANESE IMMIGRATION
Subtopic:   PETITION NOT IN REGULAR FORM-MOTION FOR ITS RETURN
Permalink
LIB

Hewitt Bostock (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

If the hon. member will

make a motion to that effect at a subsequent sitting-or, by unanimous consent at this sitting-the petition will be returned to him.

Topic:   JAPANESE IMMIGRATION
Subtopic:   PETITION NOT IN REGULAR FORM-MOTION FOR ITS RETURN
Permalink
CON

William Garland McQuarrie

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. McQUARRIE:

I will move that, Mr. Speaker.

Topic:   JAPANESE IMMIGRATION
Subtopic:   PETITION NOT IN REGULAR FORM-MOTION FOR ITS RETURN
Permalink
LIB

Hewitt Bostock (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

By unanimous consent. Motion agreed to.

Topic:   JAPANESE IMMIGRATION
Subtopic:   PETITION NOT IN REGULAR FORM-MOTION FOR ITS RETURN
Permalink

LAKE OF THE WOODS REGULATION


Sir LOMER GOUIN (Minister of Justice) moved for leave to introduce Bill No. 175, to repeal The Lake of the Woods Regulation Act, 1921. . He said: This is a similar bill to one which was introduced at the last session by the then Solicitor General. It is in regard to the control of the Lake of the Woods, the Winnipeg and English rivers and Lac Seul. As hon. gentlemen will remember, some time before the session of 1921 an agreement was arrived at between the federal government and the government of Ontario to the effect that the control of these lakes and rivers should be given to a board composed of four members, two appointed by the federal government and two by the Ontario government. This arrangement was put into force by orders in council passed by the two governments, which in turn with the agreement, were to be confirmed and ratified by this parliament and by the legislature of Ontario. In accordance with that agreement a bill was introduced and passed in this House, and it is now on the statute book as chapter 10 of the acts of 1921. ^ The government of Ontario introduced a similar bill but the House prorogued before there was time to pass the measure. In these circumstances the government of Canada thought it wise that federal legislation in the matter should be enacted without delay, so chapter 38 of the statutes of 1921 was passed, giving the Canadian government control of the Lake of the Woods, the Winnipeg and English rivers and Lac Seul. It was also provided by that statute that whenever the province of Ontario should legislate in accordance with the arrangement made, the Governor in Council should repeal chapter 38 of the statutes of 1921. We now propose by this bill as it was last year to repeal purely and simply chapter 38 and for this reason: In addition to what I have said, there was a clause in that chapter to the effect that while the Governor in Council would have a right to repeal the statute, this would not affect a certain clause in virtue of which it was declared that all these works around the Lake of the Woods and the different rivers mentioned were for the general advantage of Canada. It has been represented to us that this was not the agreement, and that the two parties, the government of Canada and the province of On-



Labour and Organization tario, should be put in exactly the same position as they were when the arrangement was agreed upon and signed. That is the reason why we now repeat this same legislation. I may say that the bill last year, while it passed this House, was not assented to by the Senate.


CON

Arthur Meighen (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. MEIGHEN:

May I ask, what is the attitude of the present government of Manitoba toward this bill?

right of any Canadian worker to join a legitimate trade union if he so desires.

Topic:   LAKE OF THE WOODS REGULATION
Permalink
LIB

Hewitt Bostock (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

I may say that the motion comes under Rule 39. It is certainly a definite matter of urgent public importance. However, subsection (4) of Rule 39 says:

He (the mover) then hands a written statement of the matter proposed to be discussed to the Speaker, who, if he thinks it in order, reads it out and asks whether the member has the leave of the House.

Topic:   LAKE OF THE WOODS REGULATION
Permalink
LIB

Lomer Gouin (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada)

Liberal

Sir LOMER GOUIN:

I think that the government of Manitoba will be satisfied with the bill if it passes as introduced.

u Mr- MEIGHEN: My hon. friend says he thinks" so. Has he had word from the government of Manitoba to that effect?

Topic:   LAKE OF THE WOODS REGULATION
Permalink
LIB

Lomer Gouin (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada)

Liberal

Sir LOMER GOUIN:

I may say that there is an agreement among the three parties, that is, the Canadian government, the province of Ontario, and the province of Manitoba, that when certain conditions have been fulfilled by the province of Ontario the province of Manitoba will be willing and will consent to the passing of this legislation.

Motion agreed to and bill read the first time.

Has the hon. member the leave of the House to introduce said motion?

Some hon. members: Aye.

M'. SPEAKER: The rule goes on:

If objection is taken, the Speaker requests those members who support the motion to rise in their places and, if more than twenty members rise accordingly, the Speaker calls upon the member who has asked for leave.

I take it that more than twenty members said "Aye." The hon. gentleman may proceed.

Topic:   LAKE OF THE WOODS REGULATION
Permalink
PRO

Alan Webster Neill

Progressive

Mr. NEILL:

This matter has been brought up so hurriedly that I have not had time to provide full data on the subject, but the facts are so outstanding that they almost speak for themselves.

Topic:   LAKE OF THE WOODS REGULATION
Permalink

PRIVATE BILLS FIRST READINGS


r'J1 l71 (fr°m the Senate), for the relief of Gladys Teague.-Mr. Garland (Carle-ton). 172 (from the Senate), for the relief of Elizabeth McKinley. Mr. Chew. Bill No. 173 (from the Senate), for the relief of Algernon Cecil Aubry Moran.-Mr Baxter. Bill No. 174 (from the Senate), for the relief of Emily Adlene McCausland.-Mr. Boys.


LABOUR AND ORGANIZATION

REPORTED ACTION OF THE POWELL RIVER PAPER COMPANY


On the Orders of the Day:


May 18, 1923