May 30, 1923

LIB

Hon. Mr. GRAHAM: (Minister of Railways and Canals)

Liberal

1. Ten.

2. Six.

3. Yes; two.

4. S.S. T. J. Drummond and J. A. McKee are chartered to the Great Lakes Transportation Company Limited.

5. (a) Fort William to Bay ports, 1923, 4 cents per bushel, (b) Fort William to Port Colborne, 1923, 4 cents per bushel, (c) Fort Wii'iam to Buffalo, 1923, nothing carried. The Canadian Government Merchant Marine confines its efforts to the carrying of grain between Canadian ports, (d) Between Port Colborne and Montreal, 1923, nothing carried.

6. (a) and (b), 4 cents per bushel.

7. (a) and (b), 4 cents per bushel.

8. (a) and (b), 5 cents per bushel; storage grain 74 cents per bushel.

8. 4J cents per bushel, (a) and (b).

10. (a) and (b), 4 cents per bushel; (d) 7 cents per bushel.

11. (a) and (b), 4 cents per bushel; (d), 6i cents per bushel.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   CANADIAN GOVERNMENT MERCHANT MARINE
Permalink

ASSINIBOINE RIVEK WORKS


Mr. LEADER-. 1. What is the total amount of money expended by the federal government in dyking, excavating, etc., on the Assiniboine river between the cities of Portage la Prairie and Winnipeg? 2. In what years were these expenditures made?


PRO

Hon. Mr. KING (Kootenay) :

Progressive

1. 833,127.84.

2. Expenditure 1908-09, $5,211.50; 1913-14, $5,117.80; 1914-15,814,309.74; 1916-17,82,274.45; 1917-18, $1,59S.45; 1919-20, $177.20; 1920-21, $316,25; 1922-23, $4,122.45; total, $33,127.84.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   ASSINIBOINE RIVEK WORKS
Permalink

QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN


CIVIL SERVANTS IN OTTAWA Mr. McQUARRIE: 1. How many civil servants employed full time are there in all departments, resident in the city of Ottawa ? 2. How many civil servants employed full time are there in all the departments, resident outside the city of Ottawa? RURAL MAIL CARRIERS Mr. W. C. GOOD (Brant) moved: For a return showing the names and addresses, by provinces, of the rural mail carriers.


LIB

George Perry Graham (Minister of Railways and Canals)

Liberal

Hon. Mr. GRAHAM:

I would ask the

hon. gentleman not to press this motion. The same principle would apply to it as applied

to the one moved yesterday by the hon. member for Calgary East (Mr. Irvine) which the House thought it not wise to press for the reasons I then gave to the House.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Permalink
IND

William Charles Good

Independent Progressive

Mr. GOOD:

I do not think the expense

involved in answering this question would be considerable, nor could L quite appreciate the objections that were raised yesterday. I might call attention to question No. 5 on to-day's order paper which also involves bringing down a considerable list of civil servants in Ottawa. However, if the government declines to give the list, I shall have to be content.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Permalink
LIB

Hewitt Bostock (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

Dropped.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Permalink
IND

William Charles Good

Independent Progressive

Mr. GOOD:

No, Mr. Speaker, I did not

drop it. I say that if the government declines to give the information I shall have to be content with that.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Permalink
LIB

Hewitt Bostock (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

Then it is dropped.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Permalink
IND

William Charles Good

Independent Progressive

Mr. GOOD:

I understand it is voted $own. I did not drop it.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Permalink
LIB

Hewitt Bostock (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Motion negatived on division.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   QUESTION PASSED AS ORDER FOR RETURN
Permalink

UNOPPOSED MOTIONS FOR PAPERS

PRO

George Gibson Coote

Progressive

Mr. COOTE:

For a copy of all returns made to the minister during the last fiscal year under subsection 2 of section 91 of the Bank Act.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   UNOPPOSED MOTIONS FOR PAPERS
Sub-subtopic:   BANK RETURNS
Permalink

GOVERNMENT GRAIN ELEVATOR SYSTEM

PRO

George Gibson Coote

Progressive

Mr. COOTE:

For a copy of all correspondence, telegrams, reports, memoranda and other documents, passing between the Department of Railways and Canals or the Department of Marine and Fisheries and Messrs. Fennell, Henry and Smith, in regard to the grain elevator system from Fort William to Montreal, during the years 1922 and 1923.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   GOVERNMENT GRAIN ELEVATOR SYSTEM
Permalink

JUDGES' ACT AMENDMENT


Sir LOMER GOUIN (Minister of Justice) moved that the House go into committee at the next sitting to consider the following proposed resolution: Resolved, That it is expedient to amend section six of the Judges Act, as enacted by chapter fifty-six of the statutes of 1920, by providing that the salaries of the judges of the Supreme Court of Ontario shall be as follows- Per Annum (a) The Chief Justice of Ontario $10,000.00(b) The Chief Justice of the Second Divisional Court 10,000.00(c) Eight Justices of Appeal, each 9,000.00(d) Nine judges of the High Court Division, each 9,000.00 Business of the House-Legislation Provided that the judge who at present holds the office of Chief Justice of the Exchequer Division, and the judge who at present holds the office of Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, shall, each respectively, and irrespective of the Division, Appellate or High Court, to which he may be assigned, continue to receive the salary of $10,000.00 which he is now receiving instead of the salary which he would otherwise receive; but that upon a vacancy occurring in the office of Chief Justice of the Exchequer Division, or in the office of Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, the salary of such Chief Justice shall cease; and provided moreover that, when the two last mentioned offices shall have been abolished, the Chief Justice who may be appointed to preside over the High Court Division shall receive a salary of $10,000.00 per annum, and the number of salaries hereby authorized for the judges of the High Court Division shall thereupon be reduced to eight. He said: His Excellency the Governor General, having been apprised of the subject matter of the resolution, has' given his consent thereto and commends it to the consideration of the House.


PRO

May 30, 1923