June 10, 1925

PRO

Mr. BRETHEN:

Progressive

1. When did construction upon the Trent Valley canal begin?

2. How much money has been expended on the canal to date?

3. What is the estimated cost of completion?

4. What is the total annual expenditure on construction, upkeep and operation, for each of the years 1920, 1921, 1922, 1923 and 1924?

5. What was the annual revenue during each of the

above years?

6. What is the nature of the service the Trent Valley canal is intended to perform?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   TRENT VALLEY CANAL
Permalink
LIB

Hon. Mr. GRAHAM: (Minister of Railways and Canals)

Liberal

1. In 1833.

2. To March 31, 1925:

Capital $19,322,364 75Income

2,324,443 90Staff (operation)

1,363,740 78Repairs (maintenance).. .. 1,296,629 89Total $24,307,179 323. $3,164,452.4. Fiscal years 1920-1924, inclusive:

Fiscal

Year

1920..

1921..

1922..

1923..

1924..

Capital Income Staff Operation Repairs Maintenance Total1,050,798 13 77,251 36 97,218 42 63,343 38 1,288,611 29379,664 11 310,489 02 106,118 89 91,842 85 888,114 87195.823 04 478,126 50 109.891 51 75,426 37 859.267 42169.655 01 223.340 23 108.268 66 66.480 96 567,744 80159,128 50 129,915 85 113,913 78 88,245 63 488,203 76$1,952,068 79 1,219,122 96 535,411 26 385,339 19

4,091,942 20

Railway Freight Rates

Outside of the renewal of decaying structures, all new construction work has been suspended since 1921.

5. Fiscal years 1920-1924, inclusive:

1920 $ 4,338 71

1921

4,162 331922

187,846 871923

28,174 561924

175,268 85Total $389,791 326. On completion, the Trent Canal system will provide a through water route for boats of 6-foot draught from Honey Harbour, on the Georgian bay, to Trenton, on lake Ontario, a distance of over 240 miles.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   TRENT VALLEY CANAL
Permalink

BILL No. 4-ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

LIB

Joseph-Arthur Denis

Liberal

Mr. DENIS (St. Denis):

Why did the government arrange for Bill No. 4, which was a public bill introduced by a private member, to be taken up for third reading on June 4, private members having no more days at their disposal ?

Right Hon. Mr. MACKENZIE KING The member for West Calgary (Mr. Shaw) had two opportunities to proceed with the bill and was prepared to do so but at the request of the Prime Minister and of the Minister of Justice, he agreed to postpone the consideration of said bill, subject to the condition and the understanding that he would be given the opportunity of proceeding with it at a later stage of the session, if it could not be reached in the usual way. The government has merely redeemed a pledge made to the member for West Calgary, who has requested this being done.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   BILL No. 4-ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
Permalink

QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS

MESSRS. L. A. FORSYTHE AND JAMES M. DAVISON

CON

Mr. BLACK (Halifax):

Conservative (1867-1942)

1. Has L. A. Forsythe, or James M. Davison, his partner, received legal work from any department of the government since January 1, 1922?

2. If so, what are the items, dates, and accounts for the moneys so paid to Mr. Forsythe or Mr. James M. Davison, his partner?

3. What amount, if any, is stall owing them?

4. Are they at present an receipt of legal work from the government?

Topic:   QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS
Subtopic:   MESSRS. L. A. FORSYTHE AND JAMES M. DAVISON
Permalink

HON. E. N. RHODES

LIB

Mr. CARRUTHERS:

Liberal

1. What amounts were paid per year by the government of Canada to the Honourable E. N. Rhodes, during the years 1919-1920, 1920-1921, and 1921-1922?

2. What amounts were paid during these years for cab or car hire for Mr. Rhodes?

Topic:   QUESTIONS PASSED AS ORDERS FOR RETURNS
Subtopic:   HON. E. N. RHODES
Permalink

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PAPERS

QUEBEC RIOTS-COLONEL MACHIN'S REPORT

CON

Alexandre Joseph Doucet

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. DOUCET moved:

For a copy of the report made by Lieutenant-Colonel H. A. Machin to the Honourable the Minister of Justice with regard to the Quebec disturbances in the early part of April, 1918.

Topic:   UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PAPERS
Subtopic:   QUEBEC RIOTS-COLONEL MACHIN'S REPORT
Permalink
LIB

Ernest Lapointe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada)

Liberal

Mr. LAPOINTE:

I do not know whether there is any report in the Department of Justice, and if there is I am not sure that it is not of a confidential nature. However, if it is possible to bring it down I shall have no objection.

Topic:   UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PAPERS
Subtopic:   QUEBEC RIOTS-COLONEL MACHIN'S REPORT
Permalink
CON

Arthur Meighen (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Conservative (1867-1942)

Mr. MEIGHEN:

The question was put on the order paper some time ago and the date of the riots was stated to be in 1917. The return brought down disclosed no report, and that technically was correct inasmuch as the riots occurred in 1918. But there was a report, because it was referred to in a debate in the House and was largely quoted from. It is on the files in the department and there certainly could be nothing confidential about it.

Topic:   UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PAPERS
Subtopic:   QUEBEC RIOTS-COLONEL MACHIN'S REPORT
Permalink
LIB

Ernest Lapointe (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada)

Liberal

Mr. LAPOINTE:

I have no objection.

Topic:   UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PAPERS
Subtopic:   QUEBEC RIOTS-COLONEL MACHIN'S REPORT
Permalink

Motion agreed to.


RAILWAY FREIGHT RATES

BILL TO AMEND THE RAILWAY ACT, 1919


On the Orders of the Day: Hon. GEORGE P. GRAHAM (Minister of Railways and Canals): If I might be allowed to do so on the orders of the day, I desire to give to the House certain information concerning amendments which I propose to move in committee, to Bill No. 181, to amend the Railway Act, 1919. I do this in order that hon. members may have on Hansard notice as to what these amendments are. Personally I am of the opinion that they make no difference in the bill, but they may strengthen it. At the end of subsection (5) of section 3 I shall move to add the following: but shall apply to all the territory west of Fort William covered by tariffs filed with the board under the terms of said agreement at the date of the passing of this act and to all lines of railway now or hereafter constructed by any company subject to the jurisdiction of parliament within such territory. I shall also move to amend subsection (6) of section 3 by inserting after the word "thereto" in the sixth line the words "within the territory."


ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS

June 10, 1925