May 8, 1939

HIS MAJESTY THE KING TO PROCEED TO SENATE CHAMBER ON FRIDAY, MAY 19

LIB

Walter Edward Foster (Speaker of the Senate)

Liberal

Mr. SPEAKER:

I have the honour to inform the house that I have received the following message:

Ottawa, May 3, 1939.

Sir:

I am commanded by the governor general to inform you that His Majesty the King will proceed to the Senate chamber on Friday the 19th of May at three p.m. for the purpose of proroguing the present session of parliament, or alternatively, to give the royal assent to certain bills.

I have the honour to be, sir,

Your obedient servant,

A. S. Redfem,

Secreta.ry to the Governor General. COPYRIGHT ACT

Topic:   HIS MAJESTY THE KING TO PROCEED TO SENATE CHAMBER ON FRIDAY, MAY 19
Permalink

ROYALTY PAYABLE ON PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, ROLLS AND OTHER CONTRIVANCES


Mr. E. J. WERMENLINGER (Verdun) moved for leave to introduce Bill No. 133 to amend the Copyright Act. He said: The purpose of this bill is to repeal subsection 2 of section 19 of the Copyright Act, chapter 32, revised statutes of Canada, 1927, which reads thus: The royalty as aforesaid shall be two cents for each playing surface of each such record and two cents for each such perforated roll or other contrivance. And to substitute therefor the following: The royalty as aforesaid shall be five per centum on the ordinary retail selling price of the record. Provided that the royalty payable in respect of a record shall be not less than one cent and not more than two cents for each playing surface and the royalty shall be two cents for each such perforated roll or other contrivance. When the Copyright Act was passed in 1921 the popular price of phonograph records was ninety cents. Five per cent royalty on the retail price would have been 4J cents, but it was decided at the time to follow the custom of the United States and make a flat rate of two cents per playing surface. Since 1921, however, and especially during the last ten years, records of cheaper quality retailing at 39 cents have been manufactured having both educational and entertainment value. A royalty of four cents on such records would be too expensive to justify any longer their manufacture. This is merely to follow the English custom. Motion agreed to and bill read the first time.


QUESTIONS


(Questions answered orally are indicated by an asterisk.)


CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS SUBSIDIES- MONTREAL TERMINAL

SC

John Horne Blackmore

Social Credit

Mr. BLACKMORE:

1* What is the total of moneys granted as subsidies to the lines comprising the Canadian National Railways by the dominion, provincial and municipal authorities: (a) prior to the

formation of the Canadian National Railways, and (b) since its formation?

2. What is the estimated cost of the Montreal Canadian National Railways terminals?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS SUBSIDIES- MONTREAL TERMINAL
Permalink
LIB

Mr. HOWE: (Minister of Transport)

Liberal

1. Cash subsidies paid by the dominion to the Canadian National Railways, as reflected in appendix No. 28 B, pages 115 to 120 public accounts 1938, amount to $44,179,077.92. The amount applicable to the period since 1921 is a refund to the dominion of $1,521.82. Cash subsidies paid by provincial and municipal authorities, as reflected in pamphlet published by the Dominion Bureau of Statistics entitled "Canadian National Railways 19231937" are as follows: Provincial, $16,698,208; Municipal, $7,393,867. The amounts of pro-

Questions

vincial and municipal subsidies paid since 1921 are as under: Provincial, $250,000; Municipal, $280,563.56.

2. To December 31, 1938, $16,651,345. The substantially modified terminal plan now contemplates an additional expenditure of $12.600.000. which will provide the company with modern central station facilities.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS SUBSIDIES- MONTREAL TERMINAL
Permalink

TORONTO POST OFFICE-COLLECTIONS FROM STREET LETTER BOXES

CON

Mr. WALSH:

Conservative (1867-1942)

1. Is H. W. Bacon, or are H. W. Bacon and Sons, the collectors from the street letter boxes and sub-post offices in Toronto?

2. If so, on what date did the contract become effective?

3. What sum has been paid to H. W. Bacon, or H. W. Bacon and Sons, from February 15, 1938, to February 15, 1939?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   TORONTO POST OFFICE-COLLECTIONS FROM STREET LETTER BOXES
Permalink
LIB

Mr. McLARTY: (Postmaster General)

Liberal

1. H. W. Bacon is contractor.

2. 15th February, 1938.

3. From 15th February, 1938, to 14th February, 1939, inclusive, $91,900 for contract work, plus $820.33 for extra vehicular service during Christmas season, 1938.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   TORONTO POST OFFICE-COLLECTIONS FROM STREET LETTER BOXES
Permalink

PRODUCTION OF GRADED CHEESE

CON

Mr. CASSELMAN: (Chief Opposition Whip; Whip of the Progressive Conservative Party; Whip of the Conservative Party (1867-1942))

Conservative (1867-1942)

1. What quantity of cheese grading 94 score was produced in Canada in the year 1938?

2. What quantity of cheese grading 93 score was produced in Canada in the year 1938?

3. What quantity of cheese grading 92 score was produced in Canada in the year 1938.

4. What quantity of cheese grading less than 92 was produced in Canada in the year 1938.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   PRODUCTION OF GRADED CHEESE
Permalink
LIB

Mr. GARDINER: (Minister of Agriculture)

Liberal

1. 23,363 boxes.

2. 414,479 boxes.

3. 692,090 boxes.

4. 98,849 boxes.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   PRODUCTION OF GRADED CHEESE
Permalink
CON

Mr. CASSELMAN: (Chief Opposition Whip; Whip of the Progressive Conservative Party; Whip of the Conservative Party (1867-1942))

Conservative (1867-1942)

1. What quantity of cheese grading 94 score was produced in Grenville-Dundas county in the year 1938?

2. What quantity of cheese grading 93 score was produced in Grenville-Dundas county in the year 1938?

3. What quantity of cheese grading 92 score was produced in Grenville-Dundas county in the year 1938?

4. What quantity of cheese grading less than 92 was produced in Grenville-Dundas county in the year 1938?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   PRODUCTION OF GRADED CHEESE
Permalink
LIB

Mr. GARDINER: (Minister of Agriculture)

Liberal

1. Grenville, 369 boxes; Dundas, 203 boxes.

2. Grenville, 9,199 boxes; Dundas, 23,612 boxes.

3. Grenville, 13,567 boxes; Dundas, 30,417 boxes.

4. Grenville, 1.511 boxes; Dundas 3,793 boxes.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   PRODUCTION OF GRADED CHEESE
Permalink

DRESSED BABY BEEF-EXPORTS TO ENGLAND

CON

Mr. SENN:

Conservative (1867-1942)

1. How many hundredweight of dressed baby beef have been shipped to England in each of the last three fiscal years?

2. Has any assistance been given by the government to exporters or others engaged in the business of shipping beef to England?

3. If so, what was the nature of such assistance?

4. How much did such assistance cost the dominion government?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   DRESSED BABY BEEF-EXPORTS TO ENGLAND
Permalink
LIB

Mr. GARDINER: (Minister of Agriculture)

Liberal

1. Fiscal year, 1936-37, nil; fiscal year, 1937-38, nil; fiscal year, 1938-39, 358.607 lbs. or 3,586-07 cwt.

2. Yes, to packing companies cooperating in making experimental shipments of beef in fiscal year 1938-39.

3. The government paid the packing companies cooperating in the experiment, and who gave their services and facilities at cost, the difference between the cost of the beef, c.i.f. London, and the price realized on Smithfield market, London. England.

4. $23,636.87, in fiscal year 1938-39.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   DRESSED BABY BEEF-EXPORTS TO ENGLAND
Permalink

May 8, 1939