Fernand Girard
Independent
Mr. Fernand Girard (Lapointe) moved
for leave to introduce Bill No. 10, to amend the Civil Service Act.
Subtopic: AMENDMENT TO GIVE PREFERENCE TO BILINGUAL CANDIDATES
Mr. Fernand Girard (Lapointe) moved
for leave to introduce Bill No. 10, to amend the Civil Service Act.
Explain.
Mr. Girard:
The purpose of this bill is to grant a certain preference to bilingual competitors for appointment as the result of civil service examinations.
Motion agreed to and bill read the first time.
Mr. Fernand Girard (Lapointe) moved
for leave to introduce Bill No. 11, to amend the Representation Act.
Explain.
(Translation):
Mr. Girard:
The purpose of this bill, Mr. Speaker, is to change the electoral designation of Lapointe to that of Jonquiere-Kenogami-Arvida.
(Text):
Motion agreed to and bill read the first time.
On the orders of the day:
Mr. J. G. Diefenbaker (Leader of the Opposition):
I should like to direct a question to the Minister of Trade and Commerce. Does he agree with the suggestion of the Gordon commission respecting the need for the establishment of a national energy authority as set out on page 57 of the report? Will he also say whether in his view there is any probability at this time, in view of the strong recommendation made by the commission in that regard, of the implementation of that section of the report?
Right Hon. C. D. Howe (Minister of Trade and Commerce):
Mr. Speaker, I have never 82715-15i
considered the matter. The decision would be a matter for the government rather than for one minister, and I do not care to express an opinion at this time.
On the orders of the day:
Mr. Alistair Stewart (Winnipeg North):
Mr. Speaker, I should like to direct a question to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, of which I have given him notice. Will the minister comment on the statement in the Financial Post issue of January 12 that the Canadian visa office in Vienna is now handling only "sponsored" or "special" cases of the Hungarian refugees?
Hon. J. W. Pickersgill (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration):
Mr. Speaker, that statement is substantially correct. Late in December I gave instructions that only sponsored cases should be handled in the office in Vienna and that the selection of other people to come to Canada should be made by teams going into the camps. If you will permit me to give an explanation, sir, I think perhaps hon. members would be interested to know why I gave that instruction. About that time it was beginning to be apparent that some of the latest arrivals in Austria from Hungary, by coming direct to the office in Vienna, were getting ahead of others in the queue. It seemed to me that those who had been waiting longest in the camps should have at least an equal opportunity to come. I thought it was much better to have the general selection done in the camps, and that is what is being done now for the movement in February.