March 28, 1957

PC

George Harris Hees

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Hees:

I should like to direct a question to the Prime Minister in view of the

answer he gave to the Leader of the Opposition. Does he not consider that writing a letter as Prime Minister, which he did, to the chairman of the C.B.C. was an interference with the operations of the C.B.C.?

Topic:   CANADIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
Subtopic:   PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROGRAMMING
Sub-subtopic:   GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE
Permalink
LIB

Louis Stephen St-Laurent (Prime Minister; President of the Privy Council)

Liberal

Mr. St. Laurent (Quebec East):

I do not

consider it was my fault that I was Prime Minister at that time. That is something which the hon. gentleman will soon have an opportunity to try to do his best to undo.

(Translation):

Topic:   CANADIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
Subtopic:   PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROGRAMMING
Sub-subtopic:   GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE
Permalink

CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS

QUEEN ELIZABETH HOTEL


On the orders of the day:


IND

Paul-Edmond Gagnon

Independent

Mr. Paul E. Gagnon (Chicoutimi):

Mr. Speaker, I have a question to put to the Prime Minister. Could he tell us if he has taken steps so that the new hotel which is being built by the Canadian National in Montreal will be called Chateau Maisonneuve instead of Queen Elizabeth?

Right Hon. L. S. St. Laurent (Prime

Minister): No, Mr. Speaker, he has taken no recent steps in this regard.

(Text):

Topic:   CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS
Subtopic:   QUEEN ELIZABETH HOTEL
Sub-subtopic:   INQUIRY AS TO CHANGE OF NAME
Permalink

BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED


On the orders of the day: Right Hon. L. S. St. Laurent (Prime Minister): Mr. Speaker, I promised yesterday to be more precise about what further legislation it was intended to have dealt with. I went over the list of the matters I had mentioned to the house on February 21, and I find there are three that are not yet on the order paper. One is the legislation to confirm the Northwest Territories boundary survey. We will not be able to proceed with that unless the legislature of Alberta adopts its own legislation early enough to allow it to be proceeded with at this session. The other two were, first, legislation to set up a peace bridge authority. That is being put on the order paper in the other place today. The remaining matter is the Canadian National Railways annual financing bill, and notice of the resolution in that respect is being put in Votes and Proceedings so it may come on our order paper immediately. There is one other matter that had been mentioned, and in the absence of the Minister of Justice I was not able to ascertain what the position is with respect to it. I had suggested on February 21 that there might be a small amendment to the Canada Evidence Act or another appropriate statute to facilitate the use of photostatic copies of documents to make it unnecessary to impound originals in prosecutions under federal legislation. The Minister of Justice was to ascertain whether there was not already sufficient authority in the statutes, and I have not been able to ascertain whether or not that would be necessary. There is another matter that I omitted by inadvertence to mention on February 21. There was then the possibility that legislation might be asked for to assist in implementing the provincial legislation establishing agricultural products marketing boards. We have now reached the position where it does seem to be advisable to prepare legislation to enable the marketing boards for agricultural products set up under provincial authority to operate more effectively and without some of the legal objections that have been suggested heretofore.


PC

John George Diefenbaker (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. J. G. Diefenbaker (Leader of the Opposiiion):

Are we to take it that before the house is dissolved legislation will be introduced relative to the Agricultural Products Marketing Act?

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink
LIB

Louis Stephen St-Laurent (Prime Minister; President of the Privy Council)

Liberal

Mr. St. Laurent (Quebec East):

Oh, yes. That is intended to be introduced just as soon as the form can be adopted after prompt dispatch to the provincial authorities interested in the legislation.

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink
PC

John George Diefenbaker (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Diefenbaker:

We will do everything to assist.

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink
PC

Donald Methuen Fleming

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Donald M. Fleming (Eglinlon):

I take it, then, it follows that the government does not intend at this session to implement any of the recommendations of the Fowler royal commission report?

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink
LIB

Louis Stephen St-Laurent (Prime Minister; President of the Privy Council)

Liberal

Mr. St. Laurent (Quebec East):

I have read half the Fowler royal commission report, and there certainly will be no attempt to introduce legislation to implement any of the recommendations of the Fowler report before prorogation of this session of parliament.

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink
PC

Donald Methuen Fleming

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Fleming:

Mr. Speaker, may I ask if the

government will be prepared to make a statement before prorogation of parliament as to the implementation of any recommendations in that report that are capable of implementation without legislation, such as the end of the policy of monopoly in local television broadcasting?

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink
LIB

Louis Stephen St-Laurent (Prime Minister; President of the Privy Council)

Liberal

Mr. St. Laurent (Quebec East):

Well, I have not seen the discussion of the provision to which the hon. gentleman refers as a monopoly in that regard, and I do not really think it would be fair to the royal commission for

The Budget-Mr. Diefenbaker us to attempt to come to definite conclusions in a short time about this very interesting study that has been made.

Perhaps I may add just one further comment with respect to the federal district commission. I think probably it would be desirable if the draft bill could be read a first time so it could be available and allow hon. members to see what our thinking has been after giving careful consideration to the report of the joint committee at the last session; but there would be no intention of trying to have the legislation adopted before the end of the present session.

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink
PC

John George Diefenbaker (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Diefenbaker:

That is agreeable to the official opposition.

Topic:   BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Subtopic:   ANNOUNCEMENT OF FURTHER LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED
Permalink

PIPE LINES

TRANS-CANADA PIPE LINES-SETTING OF RATES


On the orders of the day:


March 28, 1957