January 22, 1958

LIB

Lester Bowles Pearson (Leader of the Official Opposition)

Liberal

Hon. L. B. Pearson (Leader of ihe Opposition):

Mr. Speaker, may I ask the Secretary of State for External Affairs whether the intergovernmental agreement between Canada and the United States has been concluded yet covering the operation of the North American air defence command, which was set up six months ago?

Topic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Subtopic:   U.S.-CANADA JOINT AIR DEFENCE COMMAND
Permalink
PC

Sidney Earle Smith (Secretary of State for External Affairs)

Progressive Conservative

Hon. Sidney E. Smith (Secretary of State for External Affairs):

Mr. Speaker, in reply to that question I must state that it has not been concluded. I do know, or I heard yesterday, that the first draft of the note is now being concluded and it is to be sent to the United States authorities for consideration.

Topic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Subtopic:   U.S.-CANADA JOINT AIR DEFENCE COMMAND
Permalink
CCF

Stanley Howard Knowles

Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (C.C.F.)

Mr. Knowles (Winnipeg North Centre):

Mr. Speaker, may I ask whether this exchange of notes is between the Department of External Affairs and the department of state of the United States or between the defence departments of the two countries?

Topic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Subtopic:   U.S.-CANADA JOINT AIR DEFENCE COMMAND
Permalink
PC

Sidney Earle Smith (Secretary of State for External Affairs)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Smith (Hastings-Frontenac):

It is being negotiated through the ordinary diplomatic channels.

Topic:   NATIONAL DEFENCE
Subtopic:   U.S.-CANADA JOINT AIR DEFENCE COMMAND
Permalink

MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM

REPORTED


On the orders of the day:


LIB

Paul Joseph James Martin

Liberal

Hon. Paul Martin (Essex East):

Mr. Speaker, may I ask the Minister of Trade and Commerce if his attention has been directed to the statement of two important members of the recent trade mission which under his direction went to the United Kingdom. This statement appears in this morning's papers, and is to the effect that in the interests of that mission the government's proposal of a diversion of trade from one friendly country to another should be dropped. Has the minister any comment to make on this statement?

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
PC

Gordon Minto Churchill (Minister of Trade and Commerce)

Progressive Conservative

Hon. Gordon Churchill (Minister of Trade and Commerce):

Mr. Speaker, I would be

very pleased to comment on the inaccuracy

3598 HOUSE OF COMMONS

Inquiries of the Ministry

of the hon. member's statement, because as was not against any individual member, and I read the article in the paper they did not I do not consider the point of order well say that the government's proposal should taken.

be dropped. They say this talk largely Mr. Fleming: Bogus points of order, emanated from my hon. friends opposite,

who are apparently opposed to increasing skim milk powder-provision of credits to our trade with the United Kingdom. India

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
LIB

Paul Joseph James Martin

Liberal

Mr. Martin (Essex East):

That is not true.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
LIB

Andrew Wesley Stuart

Liberal

Mr. Stuart (Charlotte):

Oh, no.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
PC

Gordon Minto Churchill (Minister of Trade and Commerce)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Churchill:

They say that this talk should be discontinued because it will have an adverse effect on our general trade relations. My hon. friends opposite are the ones wholly responsible for the comments made by these two distinguished members of the mission.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
LIB

Paul Joseph James Martin

Liberal

Mr. Martin (Essex East):

Mr. Speaker,

under the rules of the house no hon. member has the right to attribute-

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
?

Some hon. Members:

Question.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
LIB

Lionel Chevrier (Official Opposition House Leader; Liberal Party House Leader)

Liberal

Mr. Chevrier:

On a point of order.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
LIB

Paul Joseph James Martin

Liberal

Mr. Martin (Essex East):

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker-

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
PC

Thomas Miller Bell

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Bell (Saint John-Alberl):

Well, why don't you say so?

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
LIB

Pierre Gauthier (Chief Opposition Whip; Whip of the Liberal Party)

Liberal

Mr. Gauthier (Portneuf):

Well, shut up and he will say so.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
PC

Daniel Roland Michener (Speaker of the House of Commons)

Progressive Conservative

Mr. Speaker:

Order. I hope this beginning is not significant. The hon. member has a point of order.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink
LIB

Paul Joseph James Martin

Liberal

Mr. Martin (Essex East):

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, the hon. gentleman has no right to attribute to another hon. member something the hon. member has previously denied. We have clearly indicated on this side that we are not opposed to increasing trade with the United Kingdom.

Topic:   MISSION TO UNITED KINGDOM
Subtopic:   REPORTED
Sub-subtopic:   STATEMENT ON DIVERSION
Permalink

January 22, 1958