Henry Robert EMMERSON

EMMERSON, The Hon. Henry Robert, P.C., K.C., LL.B., LL.D., D.C.L.

Personal Data

Party
Liberal
Constituency
Westmorland (New Brunswick)
Birth Date
September 25, 1853
Deceased Date
July 9, 1914
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Emmerson
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=05ffcd85-4168-4656-82c4-05a0c40faaae&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
lawyer

Parliamentary Career

November 7, 1900 - January 14, 1904
LIB
  Westmorland (New Brunswick)
January 30, 1904 - September 29, 1904
LIB
  Westmorland (New Brunswick)
  • Minister of Railways and Canals (January 15, 1904 - April 2, 1907)
November 3, 1904 - September 17, 1908
LIB
  Westmorland (New Brunswick)
  • Minister of Railways and Canals (January 15, 1904 - April 2, 1907)
October 26, 1908 - July 29, 1911
LIB
  Westmorland (New Brunswick)
September 21, 1911 - October 6, 1917
LIB
  Westmorland (New Brunswick)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 1138 of 1138)


March 1, 1901

Mr. EMMERSON.

the House that this Bill, No. 27, is printed while Bill No. 14, to incorporate the Century Life Insurance Company, is not printed. 1 think these Bills should be printed consecutively.

Topic:   ATLANTIC AND LAKE SUPERIOR RAILWAY COMPANY.
Full View Permalink

March 1, 1901

Mr. EMMERSON.

The hon. gentleman may say ' Oh,' but that consideration is

relevant in a discussion of this kind, because, as I understand it, a dogma is an opinion or theory derived from the gospels, and formulated as a doctrine by the church ; or, it is an opinion or theoiy of men founded on the words of Christ. Without going into a discussion of dogma, or without considering at all the religious opinions that may be held, it must be apparent that we, as citizens of the empire, interested in the sovereign, interested in all that appertains to his kingly office, should be anxious to see that there is nothing- surrounding his high estate which could in any way transgress that liberty of conscience which is enjoyed by all those living in the British Empire. I for one am willing to subscribe to the proposition, that we as citizens of the empire should respectfully suggest and pray that there shall be eliminated from the coronation ceremony anything that could be considered as offensive to the religious convictions of any subject of His Majesty.

The hon. gentleman from West York (Mr. Wallace) referred to the fact that His Majesty, as King of England, was obliged to subscribe to the Westminster Confession of Faith, and also to the Thirty-nine Articles. While that may be so, it would seem to me that His Majesty does not do so as an individual, or as a King, but that he does it under the law as head of the church. If His Majesty subscribes to the Thirty-nine Articles, I hold that he does not in any sense subscribe to the Westminster Confession, for it stands to reason that he cannot subscribe to both, because for many reasons they are diametrically opposed to each other. Therefore, while the law recognizes him as head of the Established Church in Scotland, and also as head of the Established Church in England, yet the law does not require of him that he shall personally subscribe to any of the doctrines or dogmas contained either in the Thirty-nine Articles or in the Westminster Confession of Faith.

Topic:   SUPPLY-THE CORONATION OATH.
Full View Permalink

March 1, 1901

Mr. EMMERSON.

I accept my hon. friend's statement, but if his suggestion were carried out, there would be nothing left in the declaration, and there would be no necessity for any declaration at all in connection with the coronation oath. It has been said that this motion has been introduced in such a way as to prevent any amendment being moved, but it will be seen that there is no necessity, there cannot be any necessity, for any amendment, because the question is simply one as to whether this declaration should not stand as it is with respect to those features in it which are complained of, or whether we should say to His Majesty that it is quite proper that the declaration should remain as it has stood for upwards of 200 years.

At six o'clock. House took recess.

After Recess.

House resumed at eight o'clock.

Topic:   SUPPLY-THE CORONATION OATH.
Full View Permalink