John Douglas HAZEN

HAZEN, The Hon. Sir John Douglas, P.C., K.C., LL.D.
Personal Data
- Party
- Conservative (1867-1942)
- Constituency
- City and County of St. John (New Brunswick)
- Birth Date
- June 5, 1860
- Deceased Date
- December 27, 1937
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Douglas_Hazen
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=15b270da-620f-48bb-be53-9255fee3838d&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- lawyer
Parliamentary Career
- March 5, 1891 - April 24, 1896
- CONCity and County of St. John (New Brunswick)
- October 27, 1911 - October 6, 1917
- CONCity and County of St. John (New Brunswick)
- Minister of the Naval Service (October 10, 1911 - October 11, 1917)
- Minister of Marine and Fisheries (October 10, 1911 - October 11, 1917)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 2 of 930)
September 15, 1917
Mr. HAZEN:
*No, my hon. friend is mistaken.
September 15, 1917
Mr. HAZEN:
No. All they get is this amount for a period of thirty-five years, and the amount is barely sufficient, if it is sufficient, to pay the interest on the full amount. Thus they must desire a considerable revenue from the operations of the dock. It is very desirable that, at Halifax on the east coast, and at some point on the
west coast, Esquimalt or Vancouver, there should be first-class docks, in the interest of the defence and of the
trade of Canada, and also ' of the
larger interests of the Empire. The matter has been considered by the Government, and no doubt by previous governments, and when the hon. member for Winnipeg (Mr. Rogers) then Minister of Public Works was in England in March and April last, the matter was taken up with the Imperial authorities. He had many interviews with officials of the Admiralty, the Foreign Office and the Colonial Office, and urged the necessity, from the standpoint of the Empire itself, of constructing docks on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, of a size that fwould make them available for the accommodation of the largest war vessels and commercial vessels now afloat. The hon. member for Winnipeg has just informed me that he has some interesting correspondence on that subject which he had with members of the British Government, but that it is impossible for him to lay his hand on it this afternoon; and he has suggested that the matter be allowed to stand until the next sitting so that he may have an opportunity of giving that information to the House in more detail than he can do to-day. Under those circumstances, I suggest that we pass the second reading, with the understanding that we go into committee on the Bill at the next sitting.
Motion agreed to and Bill read the second time.
Subtopic: SECOND READING OF BIRD.
September 15, 1917
Mr. HAZEN:
I have a statement from the Board of Pension Commissioners showing the amount that will be required for the year. The total amount required is $8,000,000, made us as follows:
1. Pensions already granted-
Amount paid for pensions in Canada and England for months of
April, May and June, 1917 $1,253,470
Estimate of pensions to be paid from July 1, 1917, to March 31, jgig , 3,021,637
2. New Pensions-
New pensions estimated at $1,800 per month from July 1, 1917, to March 31, 1918, at average of $400 per pension per month $2,700,000
The average of $400 per pension per month Is based on past business; 1,000 pensions for
April, 1917, working out at $450 per annum, and at the same number for May, 1917, working out at $380 (per annum.
3. Gratuities (for disability-Class 6)- Gratuities paid April, May
and June, 1917 $ 29,400
Estimates from July 1,
1917, to March 31, 1918, average $300 per month for 9 months, at $50 per
gratuity 135,000
$ 164,400
4. Estimated expenses of administering pensions-
Salaries, rentals, etc $ 470,000
The total has been put, in round figures, at $8,000,000. The amount of $2,000,000 is further required, in addition to the amount provided in the main estimates, in order to meet expenses up to March 31 next.
September 15, 1917
Mr. HAZEN:
That is .to carry out the legislation which was passed this year, which, hon. members will remember, gave the $100 increase instead of 'the $50 increase. The original estimates were based on the statutory increase of $50. This is to make up the difference.
Progress reported.
September 15, 1917
Mr. HAZEN:
I said we had kept that amount in the estimates foi*some years. It is not in this year's main estimates.