James Ewen MATTHEWS

MATTHEWS, James Ewen

Personal Data

Party
Liberal
Constituency
Brandon (Manitoba)
Birth Date
August 17, 1869
Deceased Date
November 24, 1950
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Ewen_Matthews
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=1843efa3-f3ae-41d8-a3eb-e1938a2fd457&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
insurance agent, journalist, teacher

Parliamentary Career

November 14, 1938 - January 25, 1940
LIB
  Brandon (Manitoba)
March 26, 1940 - April 16, 1945
LIB
  Brandon (Manitoba)
June 11, 1945 - April 30, 1949
LIB
  Brandon (Manitoba)
June 27, 1949 - June 13, 1953
LIB
  Brandon (Manitoba)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 7 of 17)


May 15, 1947

Mr. MATTHEWS (Brandon):

Perhaps the Ontario farmers or those in the Muskoka district do need some encouragement after having fared so badly in the show rings.

May I add to that, Mr. Speaker, that in the field of dairy products alone Manitoba has seventy butter factories whose product last year reached a total value of $26 million. Lots of quantity, someone will say, but what about quality? Well, I will give my answer. At that same Toronto Royal a silver cup is always awarded for the highest score in dairy products, and I am informed that Manitoba exhibitors have won that cup every year w'ithout a break for over twenty years. Then just to lend a touch of sweetness, as it were, to the whole Toronto Royal performance, out of nine prizes awarded for honey exhibits last fall, Manitoba exhibitors walked away with seven.

My natural modesty almost compels me to refrain from making this further observation, that by far the largest percentage of those prizes and awards were won either in the constituency, or close to the constituency, of Brandon which I have the honour to represent in this parliament.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   THE BUDGET
Full View Permalink

May 15, 1947

Mr. MATTHEWS (Brandon):

Do hon.

members not think it is about time we got started? The war left us with a legacy of freedom, but it also left us with a legacy of debt. Canadians, old and young, rich and poor, may just as well face the facts. Some scoffing references were made to the Minister of Finance having received in the last fiscal year $372 million from the sale of war material by War Assets Corporation. These sales, our critics point out, cannot be repeated in any future year, and that only resulting from such sales was a surplus on this year's business possible. I suggest that that implication is unfair because, on the other side of the ledger, there are special war expenditures which will not have to be repeated another year. The Minister of Finance was frank enough to state both sides when delivering the budget, and I suggest that his critics should be equally frank. He pointed out that $320 million were paid out in war service gratuities. He pointed out that $70 million were spent in liquidation and termination of war contracts that had to be halted when peace was declared. That amount, too, was spent. These two items alone more than offset the $372 million

received from war assets. In addition to these, there were many other large items of expenditure that will not apply in future years. Therefore I say that the argument, when analysed, is completely and overwhelmingly in favour of the minister's position.

May I remark right here that I regard it as a most creditable performance on the part of War Assets Corporation, to have turned back to the government in one year the sum of $372 million, with a lot more still to come. I confess to having been among those who at one time felt that War Assets Corporation was desperately slow in getting the wheels of distribution started. But the completion of their organization was doubtless a much bigger undertaking than most of us realized. I now want to congratulate War Assets Corporation on doing what I regard as a very fine piece of work, and I believe it is everywhere conceded that they are doing that work in the disposal of war material not only efficiently but above board.

May I digress to say that, in my experience, deputy ministers of various departments, secretaries, senior officials and all officials with very few exceptions did everything that was humanly possible in cooperating to solve the perplexing problems that were constantly arising following the period of the war. I want to extend to them, one and all, my deep appre-preeiation and sincere gratitude.

Reverting to the budget, I accord the Minister of Finance every credit for collecting our taxes and reducing our debt when times are good. The great bulk of our citizens have more money than they ever had. It is true that the cost of living has risen; nevertheless over a million persons bought Canada savings bonds last fall at a coupon interest of 2| per cent. There is also this significant fact that interest bearing deposits in the chartered banks last year amounted to $3,476 million, an increase of S600 million over the previous year. The number of accounts represented was 6,063,000. This does not include the deposits in the provincial chartered banks or in the post office savings department. If we make due allowance for several accounts carried under one name such as trust accounts, it is still safe to say that over five million of our population have savings bank deposits to their credit.

May I here refer to the amendment moved by the hon. member for Muskoka-Ontario (Mr. Macdonnell), in which he deplores the fact that we have indirect and hidden taxes. I am not sure that that comes with very good

The Budget-Mr. J. E. Matthews

grace from some of those on the other side of the house. Part of the amendment reads as follows:

This house regrets that the proposals of the Minister of Finance

(a) offer no relief from the oppressive burden of indirect and hidden taxes on staple necessities that compose the family budget, all of which taxes directly increase the cost of living;

(b) offer no encouragement to those engaged in the development of our natural resources, especially mining and agriculture.

In that regard the Minister of Agriculture (Mr. Gardiner) made this pointed observation a few days ago. Many hon. members heard him. He said:

In my reading of the history of Canada, particularly its political history, I have always been under the impression that the members of the Conservative party were strong advocates of the indirect system of taxation and that the Liberal party over a long period of years had been a strong advocate of the direct system of taxation.

A big principle is introduced in the amendment, but let us see how it works out in practice. Much of the record, almost the whole record, of the Conservative party is manifest in their consistent raising of indirect or hidden taxes. We all know that. During the last Conservative regime, tariffs were raised to a startling degree. Sales taxes were raised. An excise tax of three per cent was placed on all imported goods. Taxes on lower incomes were raised; postage was raised; taxes on cheques were raised; nuisance taxes were levied and taxes on sugar were inaugurated.

Let us compare, say the fiscal year ended March 31, 1941, with that ended March 31, 1945. So far as the three chief hidden taxes are concerned, in 1941 customs duties made up 16-8 per cent of the national revenue; in 1945, only 5-37 per cent. Another hidden tax, the excise tax, represented 11-3 per cent of the national revenue in 1941. That was down to 7 per cent in 1945. Sales taxes represented twenty-three per cent in 1941 and were reduced to 9-7 per cent in 1945. The total of 51 per cent in 1941 was reduced to 22 per cent in 1945. That is the answer so far as hidden or indirect taxes are concerned. With regard to direct taxation

and I mean taxes that were not hidden-the present government came right out into the open. Income taxes and excess profit taxes, which five or six years ago formed only 28 per cent of our national revenue, now form about 60 per cent of it. There is nothing very much hidden about that; it is not nearly so hidden as is the implication in the amendment to which I have referred.

Paragraph (b) of that amendment expresses the criticism that the proposals of the budget: offer no encouragement to those engaged in the development of our natural resources, especially mining and agriculture.

This is another complaint which I am going to diagnose for a few moments. I do not pretend to know anything about mining conditions. Those were well discussed a few evenings ago by the hon. member for Cochrane (Mr. Bradette). But representing, as I do, Just about the best agricultural constituency in Canada-and I have seen most of them-I propose to make a few remarks along agricultural lines, keeping in mind the purport of paragraph (b) of the amendment, particularly as it applies to western Canada. I do this because I think we are all agreed that there is no more accurate measure of our financial progress than is afforded in the realm of agriculture. In the maritimes, reports from Nova Scotia indicate that the farmers of that province netted $5,000,000 more in the year ended November 30, 1946, than in the previous twelve months. The Dominion Mortgage Investment Association reports that farm mortgage debts in the three prairie provinces are now less than one-third of what they were at the end of 1937. The research department of the United Farmers of Canada, referring to Saskatchewan, announces that during the years of crop failure and low prices there was a farm debt increase in that province from an estimated $200 million in 1930 to over $600 million in 1939, despite debt, cancellations and adjustments. The research department now estimates that over two-thirds of that 1939 debt or, in other words, $400 million, was liquidated during the years 1942 to 1946. While the average debt per farm in Saskatchewan in 1939 was estimated at $4,398, the debt in 1946 was estimated at only $1,466, or less than one-third. That is certainly some accomplishment in seven years.

A statement appearing in the press a few days ago indicated that in 1946 alone Manitoba farm mortgage and agreements of sale debt was reduced by 23 per cent, and that since the end of 1937 this reduction amounts to no less than 76 per cent; certainly another great accomplishment. I am almost tempted, to remark that this accomplishment was achieved under the beneficent reign of a Liberal government. The farmers of Manitoba no longer depend entirely on the wheat crop. They are following diversified farming, largely and successfully.

I wonder if it was possibly the Ontario farmers whom the hon. member for Muskoka, Ontario had in mind when he suggested in his

The Budget-Mr. J. E. Matthews

amendment that they need encouragement. If that were his thought, then he may be right.

For instance, some Manitoba farmers came with live stock exhibits to the Toronto Royal a few months ago. The Toronto Royal is a wonderful institution and does credit in a large way to the people of Ontario. The Toronto Royal attracts to its show rings every year the cream of Canada's production from coast to coast. Notwithstanding the excellence of those dominion-wide exhibits, including, of course, many from Ontario farms, our friends from Manitoba carried off nineteen first prizes, sixteen second prizes, sixteen third prizes, fourteen fourth prizes and thirty-three others, or a total of ninety-eight prizes for live stock alone. But that is not all. Manitoba farmers at the Toronto Royal carried off also two grand championships, one reserve grand championship, one senior championship, two reserve senior championships, two junior championships, one reserve junior championship, one championship and one reserve championship. This means a total of eleven awards and ninety-eight prizes won by Manitoba exhibitors.

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   THE BUDGET
Full View Permalink

April 25, 1947

Mr. J. E. MATTHEWS (Brandon):

I should like to direct a question to the Minister of National Health and Welfare. In the early days of the war a hospital was erected in Brandon by the Department of National Defence. It was operated for some time and then it was turned over to the Department of Veterans Affairs. Recently that department has transferred it to the Department of National Health and Welfare. Since the situation is urgent I should like to ask the minister what immediate steps are being taken to complete repairs and replace equipment destroyed in a bad outbreak of fire that occurred in the hospital a few weeks ago.

Topic:   HEALTH AND WELFARE
Subtopic:   BRANDON MILITARY HOSPITAL-CARE OF TUBERCULAR INDIANS
Full View Permalink

April 2, 1947

Mr. J. E. MATTHEWS (Brandon):

On a matter of privilege I wish to point out that neither in the Votes and Proceedings nor in yesterday's Hansard does my name appear as having voted in the vote which was taken yesterday. I was in my place, as I usually am, and I had no hesitation in voting to sustain your ruling, Mr. Speaker.

Topic:   PRIVILEGE
Subtopic:   MR. MATTHEWS-EMERGENCY POWERS BILL- OMISSION OF NAME FROM DIVISION LIST ON APRIL 1
Full View Permalink

April 2, 1947

1. How many blind pensioners were there on the rolls as of December 31. 1946?

2. What is the total number of blind?

3. Is there compulsory registration of blind persons in Canada?

Topic:   QUESTIONS
Subtopic:   PENSIONS TO THE BLIND
Full View Permalink