Thomas HAY

HAY, Thomas

Personal Data

Conservative (1867-1942)
Springfield (Manitoba)
Birth Date
August 6, 1872
Deceased Date
October 2, 1939

Parliamentary Career

December 17, 1917 - October 4, 1921
  Selkirk (Manitoba)
October 29, 1925 - July 2, 1926
  Springfield (Manitoba)
July 28, 1930 - August 14, 1935
  Springfield (Manitoba)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 2 of 56)

January 29, 1943

Right. Hon. W. L. MACKENZIE KING (Prime Minister):

I am pleased to say to my hon. friend that I heartily approve the suggestions which he has made. Indeed, the government itself has felt that it was most desirable to have committees meet at an early day, and care will be taken to see that they are constituted as soon as the debate on the address is concluded, if not, by arrangement with my hon. friends opposite, before that time.

As to some of the committees not having met last session, that in no sense is a reflection on the government. As my hon. friend is aware, any member of the house has a right to ask that certain matters should be refeired to the appropriate committees. If no request is made for a committee to meet, and matters are not thereby referred, there is obviously no need of calling a committee together.

My hon. friend has spoken about some delay in constituting the committees. I am quite prepared that we on this side should take our share of the blame, if such is to be given, for any delay; but I wish to point out to him that time and again the appointment of committees has been delayed because of the inability to get from my hon. friend and his supporters opposite the names of the members of his party whom they desired to have serve on committees. However, he no doubt intends to see that they act promptly in these matters and we may be spared that delay on this occasion.

As to the number of committees that are to meet, I imagine that a good deal of the time of members of the house this session will be taken up by service on the different committees, because there are some committees the work of which will require considerable time. I do not think the business of the house is expedited at all by having a very large number of committees, with members serving on two or three committees at one and the same time. Rather, I should think it would expedite matters to have the committees properly attended by limiting their number. I ihight mention immediately the committees which this year will be of special importance.

My hon. friend has asked that the committee on radio broadcasting should be appointed again this year. The government fully intends to see that it is reconstituted. The speech from the throne has mentioned the reconstitution of the committee on rehabilitation and reconstruction. It also indicates another committee, a very important committee, on social security. The committee on war expenditures will also be reconstituted, as well as the committee on the Defence of Canada regulations. In addition to these there will be the committee on railways and

War Labour Board

shipping. It is possible there may be a committee on canteen funds. I do not think it will be necessary this year to have a special committee on land settlement, or one on vocational training, nor will there be the necessity of a special committee on the plebiscite. My hon. friend will recollect that that subject took up a large amount of time last year, and it accounted in very large part for the delay in constituting some of the other committees.

While I am speaking on the question of committees, I may say that the government has had under consideration the appointment of a committee on estimates, but before making any final decision in the matter I should like to have a word with the leader of the opposition and the other leaders in conference together.

There is one other committee to which reference has been made: a committee to revise the rules of the house. We have, as I stated on a former occasion, thought that a time of war was not the best time to revise the rules of the house. The rules of the house are designed to apply in ordinary times; in a time of war they have to be modified considerably. We hope the war is not going to continue for so many years that the house will be embarrassed in any way by having its rules remain as they are for the present, modified by agreement to such extent as has been the case in previous sessions. However, I do not wish to say a final word on that just now. But it is the present view of the administration that this is not the best time to have a committee consider the rules of the house.

Full View Permalink

March 5, 1935

Right. Hon. Sir GEORGE PERLEY (Acting Prime Minister):

Mr. Speaker, it is my sad duty to inform this house that another of our members has passed away, the hon. member for the constituency of Montmagny, who has been the Deputy Speaker of our house. Mr. LaVergne had a varied and colourful career. He was born at Arthabaska; he went to school there and in Montreal and, I think, in Ottawa also. He was very successful at school and at the university, where he studied law and graduated with honours. He was first elected to this House of Commons in

Full View Permalink

May 4, 1934


I very much regret, Mr. Speaker, that I must ask the house to divide on your ruling. I must appeal from your decision.

Full View Permalink

March 2, 1934

Mr. HAY:

The Naturalization Act as it exists at the present time does work a great hardship on many people born in foreign countries who have come to Canada and lived here many years: I have had hundreds of

these cases brought to my notice in the past five or six years. I would suggest that some change be made which would enable these people to obtain their citizenship papers. I know many cases of sons and daughters of people who are not British citizens who have obtained their papers, yet their fathers and mothers are unable to become naturalized because they are unable to read or write English or French. I have known many cases where the sons of these people have served overseas, yet the parents are unable to become naturalized because they are unable to comply with the law as it exists at the present time. Many of these people are splendid types yet because, as one other hon. member explained, they have lived in districts remote from English speaking settlers, they have been unable to acquire the English language and are unable to become naturalized. Very often the judge before [DOT]whom these people appear adheres strictly to the letter of the law, and as a result these people are deprived of the opportunity of becoming citizens. I would strongly urge that some change be made in the law or the regulations in order to permit these people to become citizens of Canada.

Full View Permalink

April 6, 1933

Mr. HAY:

Surely the item could stand until to-morrow-

Full View Permalink