Norman McLeod ROGERS

ROGERS, The Hon. Norman McLeod, P.C., B.A., M.A., B.Litt., B.C.L.
Personal Data
- Party
- Liberal
- Constituency
- Kingston City (Ontario)
- Birth Date
- July 25, 1894
- Deceased Date
- June 10, 1940
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_McLeod_Rogers
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=28eb2ff4-b1a9-437b-87d1-34c64f68f258&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- professor, teacher
Parliamentary Career
- October 14, 1935 - January 25, 1940
- LIBKingston City (Ontario)
- Minister of Labour (October 23, 1935 - September 18, 1939)
- Minister of National Defence (September 19, 1939 - June 10, 1940)
- March 26, 1940 - April 16, 1945
- LIBKingston City (Ontario)
- Minister of National Defence (September 19, 1939 - June 10, 1940)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 794)
April 26, 1949
Mr. Rogers:
I am afraid it is.
Subtopic: DEBATE ON THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE MINISTER OF FINANCE
June 6, 1940
1. No.
2, 3, and 4. Answered by No. 1.
Radio Broadcasting
Subtopic: ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY-TRAINING SCHOOLS FOR OFFICERS
June 5, 1940
Mr. ROGERS:
No. But the authority is limited at the present time.
Subtopic: QUESTION AS TO STATUS WITH RESPECT TO ENLISTMENT
June 5, 1940
Mr. ROGERS:
Return tabled.
Subtopic: FIRST DIVISION-TANK AND MECHANIZED CAVALRY REGIMENTS
June 5, 1940
Mr. ROGERS:
The approved government
policy is that so long as N.P.A.M. units are available these are to be used as the basis for the formation of C.A.S.F. units.
Veterans will now have the following opportunities for service, which in my opinion will absorb the bulk of those who are suitable for
Questions
military service: (a) With mobilized and immobilized units, depots, and training centres, provided they can comply with the physical and age requirements, (b) With veterans' home guard companies, (c) Various appointments for officers and other ranks at national defence headquarters and headquarters of districts as a result of the general expansion of our war effort. _
In the circumstances, it is felt that a unit such as is suggested should not be authorized at this time.
Subtopic: WAR VETERANS BATTALION