William MULOCK
MULOCK, The Right Hon. Sir William, P.C., B.A., M.A.
Personal Data
- Party
- Liberal
- Constituency
- York North (Ontario)
- Birth Date
- January 19, 1843
- Deceased Date
- October 1, 1944
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Mulock
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=3fbbf99b-cf52-4821-bdc6-2ec9565a294a&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- lawyer
Parliamentary Career
- June 20, 1882 - January 15, 1887
- LIBYork North (Ontario)
- February 22, 1887 - February 3, 1891
- LIBYork North (Ontario)
- March 5, 1891 - April 24, 1896
- LIBYork North (Ontario)
- June 23, 1896 - October 9, 1900
- LIBYork North (Ontario)
- Postmaster General (July 13, 1896 - October 15, 1905)
- Minister of Labour (January 1, 1900 - October 15, 1905)
- July 30, 1896 - October 9, 1900
- LIBYork North (Ontario)
- Postmaster General (July 13, 1896 - October 15, 1905)
- Minister of Labour (January 1, 1900 - October 15, 1905)
- November 7, 1900 - September 29, 1904
- LIBYork North (Ontario)
- Postmaster General (July 13, 1896 - October 15, 1905)
- Minister of Labour (January 1, 1900 - October 15, 1905)
- November 3, 1904 - September 17, 1908
- LIBYork North (Ontario)
- Postmaster General (July 13, 1896 - October 15, 1905)
- Minister of Labour (January 1, 1900 - October 15, 1905)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 5 of 356)
May 26, 1905
Sir WILLIAM MTJLOCK.
Is that word going to qualify * corporation ' and ' person ? '
Subtopic: FESSENDEN WIRELESS TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF CANADA.
May 26, 1905
Sir WILLIAM MULOCK.
No, I am leaving town to-morrow night. I may be in town again next week, but I am not sure of my movements after to-day. I am not aware of any papers oil file which have not been brought down. I did not arrange or review the papers. The instructions were to produce the papers, and I am surprised if any of the papers on file are not produced. I do not claim any privilege ; on the contrary, I am most pleased to furnish any papers connected with the matter, and therefore I am surprised to hear that any papers having any bearing on the subject are not brought down. The other day the hon. gentleman (Mr. Boyce) stated that some payments were made to the postmaster after his dismissal. On that point he had superior knowledge, because lie had been examining the papers with a Yiew discussing them and I had not seen the for many months. I said in a general nay that I thought it impossible that moneys had been paid to the postmaster after lie ceased to render service. I asked the secretary of the department to make an explanation and I found that salary warrants had been issued until some day in \vmust The explanation of the secretary is among the papers, and I thought it was very fair.
Subtopic: THESSALON, ONT., POSTMASTER.
May 26, 1905
Sir WILLIAM MULOCK.
Subtopic: THESSALON, ONT., POSTMASTER.
May 19, 1905
Sir WIBI.I AM MULOGK.
There is no such case on record, as a man dismissed because he voted. Every postmaster has a right to vote as he likes, and he has never been interfered with.
Subtopic: THESSALON, ONT., POSTMASTER.
May 19, 1905
Sir WILLIAM MULOCK.
Mr. Speaker, the leader of the opposition asked me yesterday whether there would toe any objection to my laying on the table copies of the papers m connection with the Thessalon post office matter, which was under discussion yesterday. I told him I would think over the matter. I have done so ; I see no
objection, and I will have copies of the papers prepared and laid on the fable at the earliest possible moment.