Martin BURRELL
BURRELL, The Hon. Martin, P.C.
Personal Data
- Party
- Unionist
- Constituency
- Yale (British Columbia)
- Birth Date
- October 15, 1858
- Deceased Date
- March 20, 1938
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Burrell
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=431f1aea-d84b-44d7-82cc-340110a7e97d&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- author, fruit grower, parliamentary librarian
Parliamentary Career
- October 26, 1908 - July 29, 1911
- CONYale--Cariboo (British Columbia)
- September 21, 1911 - October 6, 1917
- CONYale--Cariboo (British Columbia)
- Minister of Agriculture (October 16, 1911 - October 11, 1917)
- November 4, 1911 - October 6, 1917
- CONYale--Cariboo (British Columbia)
- Minister of Agriculture (October 16, 1911 - October 11, 1917)
- December 17, 1917 - July 7, 1920
- UNIONYale (British Columbia)
- Secretary of State of Canada (October 12, 1917 - December 30, 1919)
- Minister of Mines (October 12, 1917 - December 30, 1919)
- Minister of Customs and Inland Revenue (December 31, 1919 - July 7, 1920)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 379)
June 30, 1920
Mr. BURRELL:
Speaking offhand, my impression of the law is that if the goods arrive at the port by the 19th they come under the old tariff.
Subtopic: PRINTING COMMITTEE'S REPORT.
June 30, 1920
Mr. BURRELL:
Speaking offhand, I
would say so; but I would not like to make
450G
a positive statement.. I will look into the matter.
iMr. M!c)MASTER: I would like to inquire from the Minister oif Finance whether we are now discussing an amendment made by the Senate differentiating between custom-made suits and tailor-made suits?
Subtopic: PRINTING COMMITTEE'S REPORT.
June 28, 1920
Mr. BURRELL:
I was paired with the hon. member for Beauce (Mr. Beland). Had I voted I would have voted against the amendment.
Mr. McMA'STER: I was paired with the hon. member for Muskoka (Mr. MeGib-bon). Had I voted I would have voted for the amendment.
Subtopic: DOMINION FRANCHISE ACT.
June 19, 1920
Mr. BURRELL:
Inland revenue, $42,949,000; customs, $13,000,000. With respect to the information asked for a moment ago by the hon. member for Westmorland (Mr. Copp), I am sorry I cannot give it at present but I will obtain it for the hon. gentleman.
Excise-$1,403,108.25.
!Mr. BURRELL: The increase in the vote for stamps, etc., is necessitated by the extraordinary increase of the various articles requiring stamps, especially tobacco, which has grown enormously this year, and apparently will continue to do so.
Progress reported.
June 19, 1920
Mr. BURRELL:
For the Inland Revenue Department they amounted to roughly $27,000,000; .and customs, $47,921,000.