James Earl LAWSON

LAWSON, The Hon. James Earl, P.C., K.C.
Personal Data
- Party
- Conservative (1867-1942)
- Constituency
- York South (Ontario)
- Birth Date
- October 21, 1891
- Deceased Date
- May 13, 1950
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Lawson
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=4b5bfbee-1eba-427e-9bad-ddade84ad69e&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- barrister
Parliamentary Career
- October 29, 1928 - May 30, 1930
- CONYork West (Ontario)
- July 28, 1930 - August 14, 1935
- CONYork West (Ontario)
- October 14, 1935 - January 25, 1940
- CONYork South (Ontario)
- Minister of National Revenue (August 14, 1935 - October 22, 1935)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 251 of 253)
May 13, 1929
Mr. LAWSON:
On referring to the Dominion statute in force prior to this proposal I find it reads as follows-I am going to omit words which are unnecessary for my purpose-
No person shall sell or transfer the stock or shares of any association. . . unless in respect of such sale or transfer there is affixed a stamp. . . of the value of 3 cents for every $100 or fraction thereof of the par value of the stocks or shares. . . sold or transferred.
Subtopic: 19C9
May 13, 1929
Mr. LAWSON:
Seventy-four per cent of
the mining stocks traded in in Ontario on the Standard stock and mining exchange are selling at under $3.
Subtopic: 19C9
May 13, 1929
Mr. LAWSON:
Under section 12 of the
Corporation Tax Act of the province of Ontario it is provided:
There shall be levied a tax of 3 cents, payable by the transferor, in money or stamps, for every $100 or fraction thereof of the par value upon every change of ownership consequent upon the sale, transfer. . .
Obviously if under the law of Ontario and the law of the Dominion the same amount of tax is imposed, then the Dominion treasury must have received the same amount of tax from that source as the provincial treasury, or else some department of the Dominion has been distinctly lax in its collection of revenue.
My other point is this. The hon. Minister of Finance stated that this was not the imposition of a new tax; it was a revision of the schedule. But may I point out to him that this introduces an entirely new principle in taxation, and I should like to hear some statement or argument from him justifying, not the quantum of taxation-that is the part to which all his statements have been directed -but the reason why a larger percentage of tax should be imposed upon the lower priced stocks than upon the higher. I should also
like to ask the minister if he has any precedent for the imposition of a stock transfer tax on an ascending ratio as the value of the stock descends. I have had occasion from time to time to examine the transfer tax laws of the provinces and indeed of some of the states, and if there is any precedent for a tax based upon an increasing ratio on the lower priced stock, I should be interested to know.
Subtopic: 19C9
May 13, 1929
Mr. LAWSON:
So far as I know, and I
have some experience, they do not have wash sales in the province of Ontario. The statutes of the province of Quebec, in which my hon. and learned friend is interested, specifically provide that a tax shall be payable on wash sales. The Minister of Finance has pointed out that these higher priced issues bear a heavy tax inasmuch as they produce revenue from which the Dominion secures income tax. But as I pointed out the other night, 74 per
Special War Revenue Act
cent of all stocks traded in on the Standard stock and mining exchange were stocks selling under $3; yet the gold and silver mines alone in the province of Ontario last year paid in dividends some $12,000,000. Surely that money coming into the hands of investors is taxable for income tax purposes just as much as the higher priced issues.
Subtopic: 19C9
May 13, 1929
Mr. LAWSON:
I am not interested in
bonds for the time being. The bon. Minister of Finance has given the returns, I understand, from the Standard stock and mining exchange. Now take the Ontario statute-
Subtopic: 19C9