Nelson Andrew RIIS

RIIS, Nelson Andrew, B.Ed., M.A., P.A.

Personal Data

Party
New Democratic Party
Constituency
Kamloops (British Columbia)
Birth Date
January 10, 1942
Website
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Riis
PARLINFO
http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=65f64341-6e0c-46ae-8714-7a9e85e191fa&Language=E&Section=ALL
Profession
author, editor, geographer, teacher

Parliamentary Career

February 18, 1980 - July 9, 1984
NDP
  Kamloops--Shuswap (British Columbia)
September 4, 1984 - October 1, 1988
NDP
  Kamloops--Shuswap (British Columbia)
  • N.D.P. Caucus Chair (October 29, 1984 - September 1, 1986)
  • N.D.P. House Leader (September 5, 1986 - January 11, 1996)
November 21, 1988 - September 8, 1993
NDP
  Kamloops (British Columbia)
  • N.D.P. House Leader (September 5, 1986 - January 11, 1996)
October 25, 1993 - April 27, 1997
NDP
  Kamloops (British Columbia)
  • N.D.P. House Leader (September 5, 1986 - January 11, 1996)
  • N.D.P. Deputy House Leader (January 1, 1994 - January 1, 1996)
  • N.D.P. Caucus Chair (January 11, 1996 - January 31, 2000)
June 2, 1997 - October 22, 2000
NDP
  Kamloops (British Columbia)
  • N.D.P. Caucus Chair (January 11, 1996 - January 31, 2000)

Most Recent Speeches (Page 1 of 1514)


October 17, 2000

Mr. Nelson Riis (Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys, NDP)

Mr. Speaker, I listened to my colleague's very eloquent presentation and I must say that it is probably one of the most thoughtful presentations I have heard in the House for some time. I commend him on his thoughtfulness and the thoroughness of his research.

I will give a speech later in the day so I have some notes here. There must be a mistake in my notes because I remember that a few years ago there used to be a 50:50 balance. The federal government would put in 50% of the funding for health care and the province would put in 50% of the money. My notes say that the federal government now has reneged so much that it only allocates 13% of the total, which means the provinces have to pick up 80 some per cent and the federal government only picks up 13%.

Would my friend at least tell me my notes are wrong? If in fact the feds are only giving 13% of health care funding, that would be absolutely scandalous.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Canada Health Care, Early Childhood Development And Other Social Services Funding Act
Full View Permalink

October 17, 2000

Mr. Nelson Riis (Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys, NDP)

Mr. Speaker, I listened to the rather enthusiastic comments of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry this morning. Normally he is a very quiet individual, a thoughtful, low key and humble kind of man. Today he is not.

I wondered what would cause my friend to have a different approach today. Then I remembered that he is a hard working and determined guy who is dedicated to the Department of Industry. When he heard the Minister of Industry was leaving, I suspect he probably thought he would get an appointment, a better job.

What does the Prime Minister do? He reaches out into a provincial legislature, picks a guy who promised to serve out his term in Newfoundland and places him as Minister of Industry. Talk about Machiavellian politics. This has to be a case study in manipulation and so on.

I assume the enthusiasm of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry is a masking an extreme disappointment that he has been overlooked and our friend from Newfoundland has been brought back into cabinet in this eleventh hour cynical move. However that is the way the world is and there is not much we can do about it.

In his comments, my friend talked about the government's restoration of health care funding. What he failed to mention is that when all of the restoration takes place, it will only lift the federal contribution to the level it was at in 1994. I want to tell my friend this is not 1994. It is not 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 or 1999. It is the year 2000. In other words, to feel great about this whole thing and to pat himself on the back with both hands, to say that we have increased funding to the 1994 levels when we know populations have increased, when we know inflation has increased, is not really that great a contribution.

I will just say to my hon. friend, we are still looking for a little bit more, but the point is still well taken.

He also mentioned the investment the government has done. I will be the first to say, yes, in a balanced approach, there have been very useful investments in the high tech sector. We are a relatively well connected country, perhaps even, as he says, the most connected country in the world, but let me also remind my friend of other investments made. They were not investments in social housing because the government says that we do not have any money for social housing, but we do have money for luxury hotels and resorts and we do have money for golf courses all over central Canada.

To make the record clear, when my friend says we are investing in the economy, yes, he is investing in golf courses, hotels and resorts, but the government has not invested a single cent in social housing.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   An Act To Incorporate The Western Canada Telephone Company
Full View Permalink

October 17, 2000

Mr. Nelson Riis (Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys, NDP)

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present four petitions today pursuant to Standing Order 36.

In the first petition from Kamloops the petitioners point out their concern about Alberta's bill 11, which they feel opens the door to for profit hospitals and threatens health care across the country.

They are asking parliament to take whatever steps are necessary to stop this American style move to health care and to consider introducing national programs for home care and prescription drugs.

Topic:   Routine Proceedings
Subtopic:   Petitions
Full View Permalink

October 17, 2000

Mr. Nelson Riis (Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys, NDP)

Mr. Speaker, the fourth petition is from members of the Sikh temple in Kamloops. They point out the importance of April 13 in their religion. They also point out their contribution to Canadian society.

More important, they call upon the House to recognize the importance of the five K s. These are the kirpan, a sword representing indomitable spirit; kesa, unshorn hair representing simple life, saintliness and devotion to God; kara, a steel bangle worn as a sign of eternity to God; kangah, a wooden comb worn to represent a clean mind and body; and kacha, short breeches representing hygienic living.

Topic:   Routine Proceedings
Subtopic:   Petitions
Full View Permalink

October 17, 2000

Mr. Nelson Riis

Mr. Speaker, I am sorry to interrupt my friend's comments on health care but I think he made a serious error in saying that only 13% was covered by the federal government. Surely his notes must be incorrect.

Topic:   Government Orders
Subtopic:   Canada Health Care, Early Childhood Development And Other Social Services Funding Act
Full View Permalink