William Joseph BROWNE
BROWNE, The Hon. William Joseph, P.C., Q.C., B.A.
Personal Data
- Party
- Progressive Conservative
- Constituency
- St. John's West (Newfoundland and Labrador)
- Birth Date
- May 3, 1897
- Deceased Date
- January 10, 1989
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Joseph_Browne
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=8fd36d5e-2e37-4c18-b543-e3b31dc856df&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- barrister, judge
Parliamentary Career
- June 27, 1949 - June 13, 1953
- PCSt. John's West (Newfoundland and Labrador)
- June 10, 1957 - February 1, 1958
- PCSt. John's West (Newfoundland and Labrador)
- Minister Without Portfolio (June 21, 1957 - October 10, 1960)
- March 31, 1958 - April 19, 1962
- PCSt. John's West (Newfoundland and Labrador)
- Minister Without Portfolio (June 21, 1957 - October 10, 1960)
- Solicitor General of Canada (October 11, 1960 - August 9, 1962)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 3 of 449)
March 19, 1962
Mr. Browne (St. John's West):
May I ask
the hon. member a question?
March 19, 1962
Mr. Browne (St. John's West):
Was the
reference to unemployment insurance or to hospital insurance?
March 19, 1962
Mr. Browne (St. John's West):
What is the text from which the hon. member is reading?
March 19, 1962
Mr. Browne (St. John's West):
May I ask
a question?
March 9, 1962
Mr. Browne (St. John's West):
Mr. Speaker, I draw your attention to section 418 of Beau-chesne, fourth edition, at page 288 which reads as follows:
The question for the third reading is put immediately after the report from the committee of the whole. All amendments which may be moved on a second reading of a bill may be moved on the third reading with the restriction that they cannot deal with any matter which is not contained in the bill. On the second reading of a bill, an amendment may be moved expressing opinions as to any circumstances connected with its introduction or prosecution, or seeking further information in relation to the bill by committees or commissioners.
Canadian National Railways the production of papers or other evidence, or the opinion of judges. This cannot be done on the third reading because it is not directly connected with any provision of the bill.
Therefore, I suggest that such an amendment as the hon. member proposes is out of order.
Subtopic: CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS