Lawrence T. PENNELL
PENNELL, The Hon. Lawrence T., P.C., Q.C., LL.D.
Personal Data
- Party
- Liberal
- Constituency
- Brant--Haldimand (Ontario)
- Birth Date
- March 11, 1915
- Deceased Date
- August 9, 2008
- Website
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Pennell
- PARLINFO
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/Files/Parliamentarian.aspx?Item=e10ba36a-10ee-446b-b3ce-002754347a1e&Language=E&Section=ALL
- Profession
- lawyer
Parliamentary Career
- June 18, 1962 - February 6, 1963
- LIBBrant--Haldimand (Ontario)
- April 8, 1963 - September 8, 1965
- LIBBrant--Haldimand (Ontario)
- Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance (June 30, 1964 - July 6, 1965)
- Solicitor General of Canada (July 7, 1965 - April 19, 1968)
- Minister Without Portfolio (July 7, 1965 - September 30, 1966)
- November 8, 1965 - April 23, 1968
- LIBBrant--Haldimand (Ontario)
- Solicitor General of Canada (July 7, 1965 - April 19, 1968)
- Minister Without Portfolio (July 7, 1965 - September 30, 1966)
Most Recent Speeches (Page 5 of 217)
March 26, 1968
Mr. Pennell:
Then I am happy.
March 26, 1968
Hon. L. T. Pennell (Solicitor General):
Mr. Speaker, I should advise the hon. gentleman that I attempted to give a lengthy answer to a similar question posed by the hon. member for Red Deer, but finally bowed to the direction of Mr. Speaker that it exceeded the bounds of propriety. I would be glad to forward to the hon. gentleman a copy of the answer I gave on that occasion.
Subtopic: REQUEST FOR STATEMENT ON EFFORTS TO CONTROL DRUG TRAFFIC
March 26, 1968
Mr. Pennell:
May I ask the chairman whether public service carried or not?
The Assistanl Deputy Chairman: Yes.
March 26, 1968
Mr. Pennell:
Mr. Speaker, I agree with the hon. member that this is a very important matter. However, I respectfully suggest that the question would be more properly directed to my colleague the Minister of National Health and Welfare.
Subtopic: REQUEST FOR STATEMENT ON EFFORTS TO CONTROL DRUG TRAFFIC
March 26, 1968
Mr. Pennell:
Mr. Chairman, I speak subject to correction on this point. It is my understanding that for the most part where a person has been acquitted the fingerprints are destroyed. I must concede that there have been instances, to my own knowledge, in which the fingerprints have been retained. However, in my memorandum to my colleagues relating to the vacating of records I also dealt with the question of fingerprints.